Experienced Fort Worth DWI Attorneys

On Texas highways, there are signs that read: “DWI – You Can’t Afford It.” True: if convicted, a first-time DWI offense can carry up to $2,000 in fines, up to six months in county jail, driver’s license suspension, and other consequences. The penalties increase dramatically for repeat offenders. Make no mistake, the MADD organization and the Texas legislature are out to catch drunk drivers with a wide net.  We see No Refusal Weekends and DWI arrests becoming more prevalent as law enforcement agencies have instituted processes for mandatory blood tests for suspicion of intoxicated driving.  With the help of experienced Fort Worth DWI lawyers, you may be able to avoid or minimize penalties.

Charged With Driving While Intoxicated in Tarrant County?

At Barnett Howard & Williams PLLC, we have substantial experience in driving while intoxicated (DWI) cases. Our Fort Worth DWI attorneys are also former DWI prosecutors and legal instructors to police academies. In other words, we have firsthand knowledge of police tactics and prosecutor techniques. This allows us to strategically challenge the evidence and aggressively defend you at every stage of the judicial process, from negotiation to trial.

Tarrant County DWI cases can be won at trial. The field sobriety tests administered by police officers are not completely reliable, especially when combined with factors such as fatigue and other alternative explanations to intoxication. Furthermore, police do not always administer the tests correctly per the manual. There may also be issues with breath or blood test results.

Do not plead guilty to a DWI charge. Let our Fort Worth criminal defense attorneys review the police video footage and the police report to see if there are areas that should be challenged.  Our Fort Worth DWI specialists can beat a DWI charge in Tarrant County.

Best Fort Worth Criminal Lawyer

I'm a professional business person and have dealt with scores of attorneys; no one is better prepared, persistent, thorough, and straightforward good or bad. (wish all attorneys were as faithful to their oath) Luke knows the intricacies of the law and the practicalities of how it's being applied given current politics, culture, and daily precedents. Luke plays for the long haul with his humble, Christian approach by developing honest, healthy relationships with Judges, Clerks, and Prosecutors.

J.W. - DWI Defense Client

I thank God everyday for placing Jason Howard and his law firm in my life. They treated me like a person who made a bad decision, and not a criminal. I prayed for a Christian lawyer and Jason's firm was listed that way. Jason was very reasonable when it came to his fees, he truly was a blessing.

R. - DWI Defense Client

Mr. Barnett is an outstanding lawyer! I can honestly say that he went above and beyond to help me understand the process and to resolve my legal problem. He was readily available, respectful, and efficient. I highly recommend Brandon Barnett. He is by far the best lawyer I've ever had!!

E. - DWI Defense Client
Top Attorneys Fort Worth

*Top Attorney Fort Worth as recognized by Fort Worth Magazine (Brandon Barnett 2014 – 2022; Jason Howard 2014 – 2022; Luke Williams 2013 – 2022; Ashley Gilmore 2016 – 2022)

DWI Laws in Texas | Fort Worth DWI Attorneys

Texas is a highly-conservative state when it comes to its laws regarding driving while intoxicated (DWI) and the consequences of violating these laws. The statutes are pretty straight-forward about the core elements of the DWI offense under 49.04.

The state must prove that the person was:

  • operating a motor vehicle;
  • in a public place;
  • while intoxicated.

Operating a motor vehicle” has been interpreted broadly by Texas criminal trial and appellate courts. There have been many decisions by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that allow for this element to be proved without any evidence that the individual was actually driving the vehicle.  In some cases, our Fort Worth DWI defense firm will challenge the state’s definition of “operation” and persuade a jury that the evidence is not sufficient to prove that “operation” occurred.

It’s also common for police officers to make mistakes when determining they have reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle. If a police officer determines he has reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation has occurred, he can stop the vehicle. Once the officer smells the faintest odor of alcohol, sees an open container, receives an admission that the person has consumed ANY amount of alcohol, he or she will likely commence an investigation for DWI.

A “public place” is any place to which the public or a significant portion of the public has a access. See Penal Code 1.07(40) This can include parking lots, in addition to roadways.

In most circumstances, the element at issue in a driving while intoxicated case is “intoxication.” The state can prove intoxication by:

  • Loss of the normal use of mental faculties
  • Loss of the normal use of physical faculties
  • Blood alcohol concentration >.08 or
  • Breath alcohol concentration >.08

The Fort Worth DWI attorneys at Barnett Howard & Williams PLLC are trained in DWI detection techniques and procedures and can challenge officer testimony using their very training manuals.

Standardized Field Sobriety Tests | Tarrant County DWI Lawyers

When determining the loss of normal use of mental or physical faculties, field sobriety tests (FST’s) are tools used by law enforcement to seek clues of intoxication. See the NHTSA Website for more details.
These tests include the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, the walk and turn test, and the one leg stand test.

These tests are 100% voluntary. You cannot be compelled to do them if you choose to refrain. As with most of the DWI investigation process, law enforcement agencies have developed ways to assist them with evidence-gathering in DWI cases. However, they require voluntary participation by the accused. Without them, the ability to prove DWI cases beyond a reasonable doubt can be much more difficult. The 5th amendment provides us with the right to remain silent. Always keep in mind, anything you say or do in these situations could be used against you in court. The NHTSA Manual provides that the SFSTs can be compromised if one element of any test is not conducted properly. Our Tarrant County DWI lawyers know how to challenge the field sobriety tests in court.

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test (HGN)

The horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test is the first of the three tests normally administered by the police officer. Some research has shown HGN can be caused by the introduction of alcohol or some drugs into the body. The HGN test is designed to reveal to the officer whether the involuntary jerking of the eyeballs which occurs as a result of HGN is present in someone suspected of DWI.

When performing the field sobriety test for HGN, there are three manipulations performed on both eyeballs. They specifically test for:

    1. Lack of smooth pursuit;
    2. Sustained nystagmus at maximum deviation; and
    3. Onset of nystagmus prior to 45 degrees.

Because they perform these 3 manipulations on each eyeball, there is a maximum possibility of six clues on the HGN test.  Most DUI attorneys understand that HGN evidence is confusing to a jury and typically not helpful to the state in proving the case.

Walk and Turn Test

The walk and turn is the second test in the SFST battery. It and the third test, the one leg stand test, are designed to test an individual’s divided attention. Divided attention can best be described as someone’s ability to use their mind and body in concert to achieve a desired result. Driving requires divided attention. So, testing for divided attention ability is the idea behind these tests. However, these tests are very peculiar when compared to the task of operating a vehicle. For this reason, these tests have and continue to come under heavy scrutiny.

When administering the walk and turn (WAT), the officer will instruct the individual to stand in a heel-to-toe position with his arms down at his side. If you can visualize it or know from having done this test, this position is very awkward and hard to maintain. While trying to hold in this position, the police officer then gives the instructions to the test and you are expected to listen and follow along. The basic instructions order the individual to take nine heel-to-toe steps down (what is usually) and imaginary line, then take a series of smaller steps to make the turn before taking nine heel-to-toe steps back to where the individual started. There are eight clues the police officer is trained to look for. They are:

  1. Cannot keep his balance;
  2. Starts too soon;
  3. Stops walking;
  4. Misses heel-to-toe;
  5. Steps off of the imaginary line;
  6. Uses his arms to balance;
  7. Takes the wrong number of steps; and
  8. Turns improperly.

These “clues” of intoxication are things that a perfectly sober person would likely experience as well when attempting this test and our DWI trial attorneys will point that out to a jury.

One-Leg Stand Test

The final test is the one leg stand (OLS.) During this test, the individual is asked to stand on one leg while extending the other leg keeping the foot approximately six inches off the ground. The individual is also instructed to point his toe outward. Again, like the WAT, this is a very strange position to maintain. Most people think of Daniel practicing the crane kick in Karate Kid. While trying to hold this position, the police officer then gives instructions to count out loud from 1 to usually 20. The four clues the police officer is trained to look for are:

    1. Swaying while balancing;
    2. The use of arms to balance;
    3. Hops while attempting the test; or
    4. Puts his foot down during the test.

Again, these “clues” are often experienced equally by a sober person and our Fort Worth DWI trial lawyers highlight that point to a jury.

After these tests are completed, a police officer can make an opinion as to whether there is probable cause to believe the driver is “intoxicated.” If they decide yes, they can proceed with an arrest. The officer could also decide to let the person go. As you might guess, it is rare that someone is released at this point.

Blood Test or Breath Test to Determine Blood-Alcohol Content for DWI Intoxication

After the driver is arrested, the police will then proceed by asking for a breath or blood specimen. In order to do this, the individual must be read their statutory warning known as the DIC-24 – see a copy of the DIC-24 form here.

After the officer reads this lengthy, wordy document to the person suspected of driving while intoxicated, they are asked a simple question: Yes or No? Often this eight-paragraph warning can be intimidating and confusing leaving the person with questions about their rights. Police are prohibited from giving legal advice to the individual. So, little leeway is given to the person and an immediate response required.

Simply put, there is no way to force an individual to give a breath test. If someone chooses to decline the request for a breath specimen, there are consequences. One of those consequences is a response by DPS to attempt to suspend your license. The other is that the police officer may try and obtain a warrant for a blood draw. In order to obtain a warrant, a police officer must show probable cause a DWI has been committed by the person suspected. If he can establish probable cause in an affidavit and find a magistrate to issue the warrant, he can proceed to take the individual to a phlebotomist for a mandatory blood draw. Once the mandatory blood draw is pursued, they will use any amount of force necessary to obtain the required amount of blood from the individual’s body for testing. The drawn blood is submitted to a lab for analyses of alcohol concentration, presence of substances or a combination of both.

Labs are not perfect and make mistakes. They operate on assumptions about the chain of custody on the blood sample and that is always at issue. The state must prove the blood tested is the same blood taken from the individual. The state must also prove the blood was tested by someone statutorily authorized to draw the blood in accordance with accepted scientific standards.

Breath machines, also known as the “Intoxilyzer,” can also be flawed. These machines are maintained by “Intoxilyzer Supervisors” who normally work for the state of Texas. As expected, their opinions and knowledge are usually state-sided. However, there are processes in place by which they must abide. For example, if their routine maintenance of the machines comes into question, the breath sample results yielded by those machines can be thrown out.  Many people will tell you that other Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex DWI attorneys have told them over the years not to blow during a DWI stop because the machine is not reliable.  We agree with that.  Any time this type of dated technology is involved, there is a concern about error in the results of the test.

Regardless, if a breath specimen is provided by an individual and that sample is over the legal limit of .08, the state enjoys the advantage of additional evidence they may not have had. There are occasions where a breath sample result yields an amount of less than .08. It is still within the discretion of the police officer or the District Attorney’s office to go forward with the DWI charge based on their investigation and the evidence they’ve observed. Admissions to drinking or drug use, open containers or drug paraphernalia in plain view or even the odor of alcohol or marijuana to name a few.

DWI Questioning | Do Not Make Any Statements

Once an officer makes an arrest for DWI, the officer will then book the person in at the local jail. At the jail, normal practice is for the officer to mirandize the accused (i.e. Read them the Miranda Warning: 1) you have the right to remain silent, 2) anything you say can and will be used against you in court, 3) you have the right to have an attorney advise you before answering any questions, 4) if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you & 5) you have the right to terminate this interview at any time). The officer will then ask them a series of questions, such as:

  • Were you operating a motor vehicle?
  • Have you been drinking?
  • How much have you had to drink?
  • What was the time of your last drink?
  • Have you taken any prescription medications?
  • Have you ever been this drunk before?

These questions require the accused to waive their rights in order to answer them. You never have any obligation to waive your rights and speak with law enforcement during this part of the process. Ever. Like the breath test, answering these questions usually supplies the state with additional evidence they wouldn’t otherwise have.  Our Fort Worth DWI attorneys can defend your case, however, even if you have made statements or performed field sobriety tests.

DWI Videos are the Best Evidence in a Tarrant County DWI Case

There is no doubt that we live in a media-saturated world. Technology has exploded onto the law enforcement scene. Video evidence has become more advanced and available for law enforcement officers. Normally, any DWI case will have an in-car dash-cam video of the stop and body cam footage of the contact and any subsequent investigation on the road. Most patrol cars have video cameras installed in the back of patrol cars that will record the accused’s transport from the scene of the arrest to the police station or jail. Finally, there will often be video evidence of the breathalyzer test or blood draw procedure and any post-arrest interviews.

These videos are the best evidence in any DWI case; even better than blood-alcohol concentration results.  If a person sounds sober and looks sober on video, there is a better likelihood that a jury will not find the person guilty of DWI.  Our Fort Worth DWI Attorneys regularly win DWI trials when the defendant looks good on the video.  Always remember, in any traffic stop, you are being recorded. Give our experienced DUI attorneys the best chance at an acquittal by not providing evidence against yourself on video.

Driver’s License Revocation And Occupational Licenses | Save Your License

After being charged with DWI, you may be subject to an automatic driver’s license revocation. You have the right to challenge the revocation, but you must act fast. Our Fort Worth DWI attorneys will assist you in requesting an administrative license revocation (ALR) hearing. We will take the steps necessary to protect your driving privileges and save your license. If your license is suspended, we are able to assist you in obtaining an occupational license that will allow you to drive to and from work, and for other essential needs. In many cases, our clients do not lose their driving privileges for even a day!

In cases where someone refuses to give a breath test or where a specimen (either breath or blood) is given and indicates an alcohol concentration of .08 or higher, DPS will seek an ALR suspension ranging from 60 days and more.

There is generally a firm 15 day period to request a hearing on the ALR suspension. It is important to speak with an attorney as soon after arrest as possible. At Barnett Howard & Williams PLLC, we include the ALR hearing in our representation at no additional cost. Depending on the facts and circumstances, there are important aspects of the ALR process to which experienced attorneys pay close attention.

In the event DPS is successful in getting the ALR judge to grant the suspension, an occupational license will become necessary for anyone who needs to maintain the ability to operate a motor vehicle. If it can be shown there is an essential need to operate a motor vehicle for work or school or to perform household duties, a petition for occupational license can be granted for someone whose license has been suspended by DPS for one of these reasons.

Our Fort Worth DWI attorneys give these matters our utmost attention because we know how important driving is to our clients’ ability to take care of their families and themselves. Filing for an occupational license and any required hearings are also part of the representation you get with our firm.

Interlock Device as a Condition of Pretrial Bond or Probation

Depending on the specific type of DWI (see below), some courts will require the installation of an interlock device on any vehicle operated by the accused as a condition of their bond. If this is required, it is important to make sure your device is installed by a company that is authorized by the courts.

Classification of DWI Offenses in Texas | Fort Worth DUI Attorneys

In Texas, there are different ways the state charges DWI offenses. They are:

  • DWI – 1st offense

    A first-time DWI offense is a Class B Misdemeanor, which has a punishment range of 3-180 days in jail and up to a $2,000 fine.

  • DWI – 1st offense with an Open Container

    DWI with an open container is also a Class B Misdemeanor, but is carries 6-180 day in jail and up to a $2,000 fine.

  • DWI – 1st offense with a BAC .15 or higher

    DWI with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.15 or higher is a Class A Misdemeanor, which is punishable by 0-365 days in jail and up to a $4,000 fine.

  • DWI – 2nd offense

    A second DWI offense (DWI – Repeat Offender) is a Class A Misdemeanor, and is punishable by 30-365 days in jail and up to a $4,000 fine.

  • DWI with a child passenger

    DWI with Child is a State Jail Felony offense, which is punishable by 180 days – 24 months in a state jail facility and up to a $10,000 fine.

  • DWI Felony Repetition (3rd offense or more)

    A third DWI offense (Habitual DWI) is a 3rd Degree Felony, which has a punishment range of 2 – 10 years Texas Department of Criminal Justice – Institutional Division (penitentiary) and up to a $10,000 fine. DWI Felony Repetition is much different than a misdemeanor DWI even though the facts of the case might be similar.

Additionally, if it is alleged someone is in an accident or if someone is injured or killed as a result of someone who is DWI, there are other serious charges that can be filed by the state. Some of them are:

  • Failure to Leave Information (class C or Class B or Class A misdemeanor)

  • Failure to Stop and Render Aid (2nd or 3rd degree felony)

  • Intoxicated Assault (3rd degree felony)

  • Intoxicated Manslaughter (2nd degree felony)

  • Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon (2nd degree felony)

  • Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol (DUI) – In Texas, DUI in only applies to drivers under 21 years of age.

Where Can I Take the DWI Education Program Course in Tarrant County?

As part of any DWI probation in Tarrant County, the judge will order that a person complete the DWI Education Class. Our Fort Worth DWI Attorneys are often asked to recommend that best facilities to complete DWI Ed. We have compiled a list of recommended facilities that offer the DWI Education program and included them on our DWI Education Class webpage.

What is the Tarrant County Felony Alcohol Intervention Program (FAIP)?

FAIP is a program in Tarrant County designed for felony repeat DWI offenders that have a history with alcohol abuse. FAIP is not an easy program, but it could help a person avoid a lengthy prison sentence as an alternative. For more information about the Tarrant County FAIP Program, see our FAIP webpage.

What is the Tarrant County DWI Court Program?

DWI Court is a new program that began in March 2016. It is administered by Judge Deborah Nekhom in County Criminal Court 4.  It is an intense program, similar to FAIP, for high-risk / high-need midemeanor DWI offenders. Learn more about the DWI Court program.

Free Consultation With Experienced Tarrant County, Fort Worth DWI Attorneys

If you find yourself in the unfortunate situation of being charged with some type of DWI offense, please feel free to call us immediately. Our Fort Worth DWI lawyers are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. We would be glad to visit with you over the phone or schedule a free consultation at one of our locations throughout the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

There are lots of lawyers that claim to be local Board Certified Fort Worth DWI Attorneys.  We are truly local, with offices in downtown Fort Worth, Keller, and Denton.  Our DWI representation package includes pretrial, trial, ALR suspensions/hearings and occupational license filings/hearings. Because of the involved nature of DWI cases, it’s important to seek representation from an attorney who can and will be there every step of the way.

At Barnett Howard & Williams PLLC, we take pride in offering personal representation that focuses on always being available for our clients and making sure you can communicate with our team anytime you need to do so. Call 817-993-9249 to learn how we can help you fight drunk driving charges.  Drinking and driving is not illegal so long as the driver is not intoxicated under the law.  Contact our Fort Worth DWI trial attorneys today and let us start defending your future!

Fort Worth DWI Defense Attorney
Thank You BHW!

No one is more prepared, straightforward, or thorough than BHW!

- (5 star review)

DWI Attorney


930 W. 1st St., Suite 202
Fort Worth, TX 76102


101 Quest Court
Keller, Texas 76248

Related Content | Texas DWI Law

Recent News / View All Posts

Refuse Field Sobriety Test Texas

May I Legally Refuse Field Sobriety Tests if Stopped for DWI?

| DWI | No Comments
We get this question all the time. People want to know if they can refuse the field sobriety tests when the police ask them to participate Yes! You may legally…
Operation Motor Vehicle Texas DWI

Operating a Motor Vehicle in the DWI Context

| DWI | No Comments
What does it mean to "Operate" a vehicle under Texas' DWI laws? The simple answer is that it means whatever the jury (not the judge) says it means. Under Section…
Final Four DWI Texas

DWI Madness | “The Final Four” Reasons Texans are Stopped for DWI

| DWI | No Comments
March Madness is here again. With the Final Four approaching, we built a bracket of our own. In this article, DWI attorney Jason Howard discusses the top four reasons people…
DWI Deferred Adjudication Texas

Deferred Adjudication for DWI Offenses in Texas | New Law Effective Sept 1, 2019

| DWI | No Comments
Finally, Common Sense Prevails Regarding First-time DWI Offenses For years, I’ve had the difficult task of trying to explain to clients facing a first-time DWI charge why their case is…