Criminal Defense

How a Fort Worth DWI Attorney Can Save Your Future: Expert DWI Defense Lawyer Fort Worth Guidance

Facing a DWI charge in Fort Worth can be a daunting experience, with potential consequences that may impact your future significantly. Understanding the legal landscape surrounding DWI charges is crucial for anyone navigating this challenging situation. This article will explore how a Fort Worth DWI attorney from Howard Lotspeich Alexander & Williams, PLLC (HLAW) can provide essential guidance and representation, ensuring your rights are protected throughout the legal process. We will delve into the nature of DWI charges, the legal penalties involved, and the steps you should take after an arrest. Additionally, we will highlight the importance of seeking professional legal assistance from HLAW, a firm specializing in DWI defense.

What Are DWI Charges in Fort Worth and Texas?

DWI charges, or Driving While Intoxicated, are serious offenses in Texas that can lead to severe legal repercussions. A DWI is defined as operating a motor vehicle while having a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher. This legal threshold is established to ensure public safety and deter impaired driving. The implications of a DWI charge can be far-reaching, affecting not only your driving privileges but also your personal and professional life.

What Defines a DWI in Texas and Fort Worth?

In Texas, a DWI is characterized by the operation of a vehicle under the influence of alcohol or drugs. The law does not formally distinguish between DWI and DUI; rather, "DWI" is the term used for impaired driving offenses regardless of age. The term DUI is not commonly used in Texas law for adult impaired driving offenses. Understanding this is vital, as the penalties for a DWI conviction are generally severe and apply to all adults.

What Are the Legal Penalties for DWI Offenses in Texas?

The legal penalties for DWI offenses in Texas can vary based on several factors, including prior convictions and the circumstances surrounding the arrest. Common penalties include:

Penalty Type	Description	Duration
Fines	Up to $2,000 for a first offense	Varies
Jail Time	72 hours to 180 days for a first offense	Varies
License Suspension	90 days to 1 year	Varies
Community Service	24 to 100 hours	Varies

These penalties can have a lasting impact on your life, making it essential to seek legal representation to navigate the complexities of your case.

How Can a Fort Worth DWI Attorney Protect Your Rights?

A Fort Worth DWI attorney from Howard Lotspeich Alexander & Williams, PLLC (HLAW) plays a crucial role in protecting your rights and ensuring you receive a fair trial. They are equipped with the knowledge and experience necessary to challenge the evidence against you and explore potential defenses.

What Legal Defense Strategies Do Fort Worth DWI Lawyers Use?

DWI lawyers at HLAW employ various defense strategies to protect their clients. Some common approaches include:

• Challenging the Traffic Stop: If the initial stop was unlawful, any evidence obtained may be inadmissible.
• Questioning BAC Test Results: Issues with the administration of breath or blood tests can lead to inaccurate results.
• Proving Lack of Impairment: Demonstrating that the driver was not impaired despite a high BAC reading can be a viable defense.

These strategies highlight the importance of having a knowledgeable attorney from HLAW who can navigate the legal system effectively.

Why Choose Howard Lotspeich Alexander & Williams, PLLC (HLAW) for Your DWI Defense?

Howard Lotspeich Alexander & Williams, PLLC (HLAW) specializes in legal defense services with a focus on DWI cases in Fort Worth, Texas. Our experienced attorneys understand the intricacies of DWI laws and are dedicated to providing personalized legal representation. By choosing HLAW, you gain access to a team that prioritizes your rights and works diligently to achieve the best possible outcome for your case.

What Steps Should You Take After a DWI Arrest in Fort Worth?

After a DWI arrest, it is crucial to take immediate action to protect your rights and future. Here are essential steps to consider:

• Remain Silent: Avoid discussing your case with anyone except your attorney.
• Document Everything: Keep detailed notes about the arrest and any interactions with law enforcement.
• Contact a DWI Attorney: Schedule a consultation with a qualified DWI attorney at HLAW as soon as possible.

How to Schedule a Consultation with a Fort Worth DWI Attorney at HLAW?

Scheduling a consultation with a Fort Worth DWI attorney at Howard Lotspeich Alexander & Williams, PLLC (HLAW) is straightforward. You can typically reach out via phone or through our firm's website. During the consultation, be prepared to discuss the details of your case and any evidence that may be relevant.

What Immediate Actions Can Help Save Your Future After a DWI Charge?

Taking proactive steps after a DWI charge can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Consider the following actions:

• Gather Evidence: Collect any relevant documents, such as police reports and witness statements.
• Contact Witnesses: Reach out to individuals who may have witnessed the incident to gather their accounts.
• Stay Informed: Educate yourself about DWI laws and potential defenses to better understand your situation.

These actions can help build a strong defense and improve your chances of a favorable outcome.

How Have Recent Texas DWI Law Updates Impacted Defense Strategies?

Recent updates to Texas DWI laws have introduced new considerations for defense strategies. Staying informed about these changes is essential for anyone facing DWI charges.

What Are the Key 2024-2026 Texas DWI Law Changes?

Key changes in Texas DWI laws from 2024 to 2026 include increased penalties for repeat offenders and enhanced enforcement measures. However, as of mid-2024, no specific new legislation with effective dates through 2026 has been enacted that significantly alters DWI penalties statewide. It is important to consult with a qualified attorney at HLAW to understand any local or pending legislative changes.

How Do These Updates Affect Your DWI Case in Fort Worth?

The recent law changes can impact your DWI case in Fort Worth. Understanding these updates allows your attorney at Howard Lotspeich Alexander & Williams, PLLC (HLAW) to tailor defense strategies that align with the current legal landscape, potentially improving your chances of a favorable outcome.

Contact HLAW today for a free case evaluation and consultation.

Do Not Lose Your Liberty on Independence Day

Independence Day is right around the corner. You will probably start seeing the notices spread across social media from local police departments, warning that setting off fireworks (including sparklers) is illegal inside of city limits. We know that you're probably going to do it anyway (so are we), but we wanted to let you know what Texas law provides regarding fireworks on the 4th of July.

Texas Fireworks Law | Are Sparklers Illegal Inside of City Limits?

While state law in Texas permits possessing and using fireworks, it’s important to note that where and when a person can possess them is still highly regulated. There are State laws that limit the use and display of fireworks but use is predominantly regulated by way of city ordinances.

Specifically, under state law, a person may not:

1. Explode or ignite fireworks within 600 feet of any church, a hospital other than a veterinary hospital, an asylum, a licensed child care center, or a public or private primary or secondary school or institution of higher education unless the person receives authorization in writing from that organization;
2. Sell at retail, explode, or ignite fireworks within 100 feet of a place where flammable liquids or flammable compressed gasses are stored and dispensed;
3. Explode or ignite fireworks within 100 feet of a place where fireworks are stored or sold;
4. Ignite or discharge fireworks in or from a motor vehicle;
5. Place ignited fireworks in, or throw ignited fireworks at, a motor vehicle;
6. Conduct a public fireworks display that includes Fireworks 1.3G unless the person is a licensed pyrotechnic operator;
7. Conduct a proximate display of fireworks that includes Fireworks 1.3G or Fireworks 1.4G as defined in NFPA 1126 Standards for the Use of Pyrotechnics Before a Proximate Audience unless the person is a licensed pyrotechnic special effects operator and has the approval of the local fire prevention officer; or
8. Sell, store, manufacture, distribute, or display fireworks except as provided by this chapter or rules adopted by the commissioner under this chapter.

Texas Occupations Code, Subchapter F, Sec. 2154.251

These violations are Class C Misdemeanors, which can be punishable by a fine up to $500.

Fireworks licensing violations are Class B Misdemeanors which can result in a jail term up to 180 days and a fine not to exceed $2,000.

Fireworks City Ordinances | Local Fireworks Rules in Fort Worth, Keller, and Southlake

In addition to State law, most cities in Texas regulate the use and display of fireworks by way of specific city ordinances. For example, Fort Worth, Texas has enacted an ordinance making the sale, discharge or possession of fireworks within the incorporated city limits a Class C misdemeanor punishable by up to a $2,000.00 fine. Similar ordinances exist in Keller and Southlake, and most other Texas cities.

Before your celebrations, it’s always best to review the above regulations under the Texas Occupations Code and check your local city ordinances online to ensure that you're legally possessing, using and displaying fireworks.

Constitutional Carry – HB 1927

All Texans over the age of 21 are now able to carry a handgun in public without a license or training as long as they are not prohibited from possessing a gun by state or federal law. In addition, the carrying a firearm while intoxicated is now a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a maximum $4,000 fine, and the carrying a firearm in a vehicle by a gang member is now a third-degree felony punishable by two to 10 years in prison and a maximum $10,000 fine. HB 1927 also allows a peace officer to disarm a citizen at any time if they believe it is necessary to protect the individual, the officer, or another person. The officer, however, must return the handgun before leaving the scene if the officer determines the person was not a threat and didn’t commit a violation. Finally, HB 1927 allows for the expungement of records for those previously convicted of Unlawful Carrying a Weapon before September 1, 2021.

Obstructing Emergency Vehicles – HB 9

HB 9 makes it a state jail felony to knowingly block an emergency vehicle with its lights and sirens on or to obstruct access to a hospital or health care facility. This offense is punishable by six months to two years behind bars and a maximum $10,000 fine. Individuals convicted of this offense are required to spend at least 10 days in jail, even if they are sentenced to probation.

False Reporting to Induce Emergency Response – SB 1056

SB 1056 makes it a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a maximum $4,000 fine, to falsely report a crime or an emergency to elicit an emergency response from law enforcement or other emergency responders. The charge becomes a state jail felony, punishable by six months to two years in state jail, if the defendant has been previously convicted twice of the offense and a third-degree felony, punishable by two or ten years in prison, if a person is seriously injured or killed as a result of the emergency response.

Enhancement for Reckless Driving Exhibition – SB 1495

SB 1495 heightens the penalty for obstructing a highway or passageway from a Class B misdemeanor to a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a maximum $4,000 fine, for an individual who engages in a reckless driving exhibition. SB 1495 enhances the penalty to a state jail felony for a person who has been previously convicted of this offense, a person who operates a vehicle while intoxicated, or who causes someone to suffer bodily injury.

Harassment Extension to Social Media Posts – SB 530

SB 530 makes it a Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a maximum $2,000 fine, to harass another person by publishing repeated electronic communications on a website with the intent to harass, annoy, alarm, torment, or embarrass that person. The penalty, however, can be increased to a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a maximum $4,000 fine, if the actor has been previously convicted of the offense or it if involved a child under age 18 with the intent to cause the child serious bodily injury or to commit suicide.

Silencer Legalization – HB 957

HB 957 removes firearm silencers from the list of weapons that are prohibited in Texas. In addition, firearms suppressors that are manufactured and remain in Texas are not subject to federal law or regulation.
Enhanced Punishment for Offenses against Public Servants – HB 624
HB 624 increases the penalty by one level for people who commit an offense against someone whom they know is a public servant or against a member of the public servant’s household or family. The increased punishments apply to arson, criminal mischief, criminal trespass, breach of computer security, harassment, stalking, or fraudulent use of possession of identifying information.

Enhanced Punishment for Offenses against Public Servants – HB 624

HB 624 increases the penalty by one level for people who commit an offense against someone whom they know is a public servant or against a member of the public servant’s household or family. The increased punishments apply to arson, criminal mischief, criminal trespass, breach of computer security, harassment, stalking, or fraudulent use of possession of identifying information.

Can I apply for an SBA Loan if I have a criminal history?

Countless small businesses have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The US Government has several different loan programs offered through the Small Business Administration aimed at helping small business get through the crisis and maintain jobs for their employees. Many of the SBA loan programs for the COVID-19 crisis can be found on the SBA website COVID-19 section.

One of the questions that we have received during the last couple of weeks is whether a person with a criminal history can apply for an SBA loan. The answer is...it depends. It depends on the nature of the criminal offense.

What will disqualify me from applying for an SBA loan?

When it comes to criminal history, the following will disqualify a company and make it ineligible for SBA assistance.

If an owner of the company (who owns 20% or more) answers YES to any of the following questions taken from the SBA application, then the company is NOT eligible to apply for SBA assistance:

• Are you currently incarcerated?
• Have you been adjudicated for a felony in the preceding 5 years? This includes
  • Felony conviction;
  • Plea of guilty to a felony offense;
  • Plea of nolo contendere (no contest) to a felony;
  • Participating in a pre-trial diversion program for a felony offense;
  • Probation or Deferred Adjudication for a felony offense.

• Are you currently on probation for a felony or a misdemeanor?
• Are you currently on parole?
• Are there pending criminal charges against you that have not yet been adjudicated (felony or misdemeanor)?

*NOTE: There is also a question on the Economic Injury Disaster Loan that asks whether an applicant has been arrested (even if the charge was dismissed) for any criminal offense (other than a minor motor vehicle violation). It is unclear whether an arrest by itself is a disqualifier or just a point of inquiry.

If a 20% (or more) owner answers YES to any of those questions, then the company will not even be able to complete its application for SBA assistance.

In the past, it seemed that the SBA was only concerned with felony criminal history (see 13 CFR 120.110), but the new applications for the COVID relief do not distinguish between felonies and misdemeanors when it comes to either active probationers or individuals with pending charges.  This is especially difficult for individuals that have a pending criminal charge to which they have pleaded not guilty and not yet received their day in court. To sink their business while at the same time presuming them innocent is not in keeping with the spirit of the presumption itself.

Please be reminded that it is a federal offense to falsify a loan application, so please don't do that.

Paycheck Protection Loan Application

Economic Injury Disaster Loan

Defining “Recklessness” Under the Texas Penal Code

There are some criminal offenses that require the state the prove that the defendant acted “recklessly” or with “criminal recklessness.” In a colloquial sense, we (including prosecutors) often think of recklessness as another word for carelessness, but it actually has a specific definition in the Texas Penal Code.

Defining “Recklessness,” Tex. Penal Code Section 6.03(c) states that “a person acts recklessly, or is reckless, with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his conduct when he is aware of but consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist, or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor’s standpoint."

What Does the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Say About Recklessness?

Unpacking the legal standard of recklessness, The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reasons that...

“Criminal recklessness must not be confused with (or blended into) criminal negligence, a lesser culpable mental state.” Williams v. State, 235 S.W.3d 742, 751 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). “Criminal negligence depends upon a morally blameworthy failure to appreciate a substantial and unjustifiable risk while recklessness depends upon a more serious moral blameworthiness – the actual disregard of a known substantial and unjustifiable risk.” Id.

Criminal negligence and recklessness differ from one another only in terms of mental state:

• Criminally negligent defendant “ought to be aware” of a substantial and unjustifiable risk;
• Reckless defendant is subjectively aware of an identical risk but disregards it

The two prongs of gross negligence or recklessness are:

• Subjectively, the defendant must have actual awareness of the extreme risk created by his or her conduct.
• Objectively, the defendant’s conduct must involve an extreme degree of risk (the “extreme risk” prong is not satisfied by a remote possibility of injury or high probability of minor harm, but the likelihood of serious injury to the plaintiff).

Reckless conduct...

• Is the conscious disregard of the risk created by the actor’s conduct;
• Mere lack of foresight, stupidity, irresponsibility, thoughtlessness, ordinary carelessness, however, serious the consequences may be, do not suffice to constitute criminal recklessness;
• Criminal recklessness is of a gross and flagrant character, evincing reckless disregard of human life, or of the safety of persons exposed to its dangerous effects; or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of a conscious indifference to consequences; or which shows such wantonness or recklessness or a grossly careless disregard of the safety and welfare of the public, or that reckless indifference to the rights of others, which is equivalent to an intentional violation of them.

Recklessness: Texas Case Law Examples

Williams v. State, 235 S.W.3d 742 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007): The defendant was convicted after her children died in an accidental house fire while her boyfriend was babysitting. The defendant took the children to a house without working utilities and left them under her boyfriend’s care with a candle lit in their bedroom. The court held that there was legally insufficient evidence that defendant consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the children would suffer serious bodily injury in a house fire. The court also said that the defendant’s stupidity did not constitute reckless disregard. The defendant was not criminally responsible for the result

Mills v. State, 742 S.W.2d 831, 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 9214 (Tex. App. Dallas Dec. 18. 1987, no writ): The defendant’s conviction was upheld where circumstantial evidence supported the conclusion that defendant placed a child in a tub of hot water. The Court found that the jury could reasonably have found defendant acted recklessly with regard to that child’s care in violation of Tex. Penal Code § 6.03(c).

Ehrhardt v. State, No. 06-02-00208-CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7248 (Tex. App. Texarkana Aug. 26, 2003): Where the evidence in an assault trial showed defendant struck the victim in the face, the court found that the defendant was reckless as to whether her conduct would result in bodily injury.